User Tools

Site Tools


algae:food:quality_safety

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
algae:food:quality_safety [2026-06-20 00:41] – [Microbiological Criteria] robertalgae:food:quality_safety [2026-06-20 01:01] (current) – [Practical Implications for Producers] robert
Line 65: Line 65:
 Commission Recommendation (EU) 2018/464 of 19 March 2018 on the monitoring of metals and iodine in seaweed, halophytes and products based on seaweed, OJ L 78, 21.3.2018, p. 16. [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018H0464|EUR-Lex]] Commission Recommendation (EU) 2018/464 of 19 March 2018 on the monitoring of metals and iodine in seaweed, halophytes and products based on seaweed, OJ L 78, 21.3.2018, p. 16. [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018H0464|EUR-Lex]]
  
-__Relevance to algae:__ This is a __Recommendation__, not a binding Regulation (see [[algae:eu_legislation_general|General on EU Legislation]] for the distinction), but it is highly relevant in practice. It recommends that member states monitor levels of arsenic, cadmium, iodine, lead and mercury in seaweed, halophytes and seaweed-based products over a three-year period, with the explicit purpose of building the evidence base for future binding maximum levels. Producers should expect that the data gathered under this Recommendation will inform future amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, and that current voluntary monitoring practice is a strong indicator of where binding limits are likely to be introduced next.+__Relevance to algae:__ This is a __Recommendation__, not a binding Regulation (see [[algae:eu_legislation_general|General on EU Legislation]] for the distinction), but it is highly relevant in practice. It recommends that member states monitor levels of arsenic, cadmium, iodine, lead and mercury in seaweed, halophytes and seaweed-based products over a three-year period, with the explicit purpose of building the evidence base for future binding maximum levels. Producers should expect that the data gathered under this Recommendation will inform future amendments to Regulation (EC) No 2023/915, and that current voluntary monitoring practice is a strong indicator of where binding limits are likely to be introduced next.
  
 === Radioactive Contamination === === Radioactive Contamination ===
Line 79: Line 79:
 Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ L 435, 23.12.2020, p. 1 [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020L2184|EURlex]] Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ L 435, 23.12.2020, p. 1 [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020L2184|EURlex]]
    
-__Relevance to algae:__Among other drinking water +__Relevance to algae:__ High-quality, safe and sufficient drinking water is essential for public health and well-being. Besides consumption, it is also used for many other purposes, such as washing, cleaning, hygiene, or watering our plants, and frequently also algae cultivation. The directive defines access to high-quality drinking water. Main objective is to ensure that water intended for human consumption can be consumed safely. 
 + 
 +The Drinking Water Directive seems to be the only place in EU regulation that mentions cyanotoxins (specifically microcystin-LR) and defines the allowed concentration. Although not directly applicable, this limit may also be used "mutatis mutandis" as an intake limit for algal biomass. 
 ==== Scientific Risk Assessment ==== ==== Scientific Risk Assessment ====
  
Line 92: Line 95:
   * __Distinguish organic and inorganic arsenic__ in analytical testing rather than reporting total arsenic alone, since the regulatory limits and toxicological significance differ substantially between the two.   * __Distinguish organic and inorganic arsenic__ in analytical testing rather than reporting total arsenic alone, since the regulatory limits and toxicological significance differ substantially between the two.
   * __Track the source water and growing conditions__ for any product where bioaccumulation of heavy metals, iodine or radionuclides is plausible, as due diligence supporting safety claims and as a defence in the event of an official control finding.   * __Track the source water and growing conditions__ for any product where bioaccumulation of heavy metals, iodine or radionuclides is plausible, as due diligence supporting safety claims and as a defence in the event of an official control finding.
-  * __Stay alert to frequent amendment__ of Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, as new algae-specific maximum levels are added on an ongoing basis.+  * __Stay alert to frequent amendment__ of Regulation (EC) No 2023/915, as new algae-specific maximum levels are added on an ongoing basis.
  
 ---- ----
algae/food/quality_safety.1781916078.txt.gz · Last modified: by robert